165.024

What do you think about this one?

. . . had forgotten about this current British military Seamaster, Nicolas. If it's an issued piece there can't be many in circulation. Your chances of finding an issued ref 165.024 . . . [watch credit: Roger G / photo credit: Dr No, 2013] . . . are highe

. . . at close to six figures U$. Roughly a factor of 10 compared to a civilian ref 165.024. Those who collected Omega in the 'golden age' like yourself and HSTE were farsighted. Enviously, Art

. . . but only one of a ref 165.024. This one belongs to a So Cal collector who specializes in Dornblüths. Gosh, I missed the boat in a big way, didn't I? These Seamasters are out of reach now. Best, Art

. . . sandwiched by CK2913 and ref 165.024, both of which were produced in greater number. And British military to boot. A charmer, Nicolas - thanks for sharing. Best, Art

The killer Duo. Alas, I only own the CK 2913 . I would love to add the ST 165024, one day. Best, Nicolas

. . . for you and wildly jealous. Congrats on scoring one of the most desirable Omegas ever! Any details on the acquisition? Most curious, Art

A dream of a watch. Alas prices are reaching the sky. Credit photos: Analog and Shift: Best, Nicolas

. . . done deal. SM 300? Hard to justify financially with an Ultra Deep on the way. One modern diver is all I can absorb. A vintage CK 2913 (or 14755 or 165.024) or CK 2914? Yes, under the right circumstances. But I think that ship has already sailed. I h

165.024 and big triangle 166.024 Pencil or Sword